The Case for Action
India bears one of the heaviest air pollution burdens in the world. Thirteen of the world’s twenty most polluted cities are in India. Air pollution — both ambient and indoor — is now the second leading risk factor for death in the country, responsible for over 1.6 million premature deaths annually. The health consequences are severe: respiratory disease, cardiovascular illness, cancer, neurological damage, adverse birth outcomes, and stunted child development.

Yet the policy response remains fragmented, under-resourced, and insufficiently grounded in evidence. Regulatory frameworks exist but are weakly enforced. Interventions are rarely prioritised by cost-effectiveness. The science-to-policy pipeline is broken.

PAVANA is established to fix this.

 

About PAVANA

PAVANA — the Centre for Air Pollution and Environmental Health at Pahlé India Foundation — generates rigorous, independent, and actionable evidence on air pollution and its health consequences, and translates that evidence into policy change. The name draws from the Sanskrit ‘Pavana’ (पवन) — wind and the purifying force of nature –reflecting the aspiration to restore the quality of the air India breathes.

 

Vision and Mission

Vision
An India where clean air is a fundamental determinant of health and human development — where evidence drives environmental policy and no citizen bears a disproportionate burden of pollution-linked disease due to failures of governance.

Mission
PAVANA generates independent, policy-relevant research on air pollution and its consequences for environmental and human health in India. We translate evidence into action — identifying the most effective and affordable interventions across sectors and equipping policymakers, communities, and communicators with the tools to demand and sustain change.

 

Areas of Work
PAVANA’s work is organised around five mutually reinforcing pillars:

Pillar Focus
Evidence & Research Original studies on air quality, pollution sources, health burden, and economic cost of inaction -- with focus on India-specific evidence gaps.
Intervention Analysis Identifying practical, high-impact, sector-specific interventions and assessing their costs, feasibility, and returns on investment -- making the case for prioritised action.
Policy Engagement Translating PAVANA's findings into concrete, implementable recommendations for central and state governments and regulatory bodies, with sustained follow-through.
Communication & Outreach Developing targeted communication strategies for diverse audiences -- from policymakers to parents -- making the invisible visible and the complex actionable.
Convening Building bridges between researchers, government, civil society, health professionals, and the media around a shared, evidence-based understanding of India's air pollution challenge.

What Makes PAVANA Different
PAVANA is not a general environmental research centre. Its distinctiveness lies in five commitments:

  • Exclusively focused on air pollution and health — depth over breadth
  • Policy-first orientation — research designed to inform decisions
  • Health equity lens — who bears the greatest burden and why
  • Intervention-focused — identifying what works, what it costs, and what it returns
  • Communication-driven — making evidence accessible and actionable for diverse audiences
  • Independent and credible — housed within PIF, a trusted voice in the Indian policy discourse

The Team

null

Dr Urvashi Prasad

Director, PAVANA - Centre for Air Pollution and Environmental Health and Senior Fellow.
null

Palak Mahajan

Research Associate
null

Monika Sharma

Senior Research Associate - Environmental Health

Realizing NCAP’s Health Promise: Indian Evidence and Recommendations for National Clean Air Programme Reform

Commission of Air Quality Management (CAQM) has the authority. What is missing is the health outcome mandate to go with it.
CAQM → Read More
CPCB has the data. What is needed is the formal connection to health outcomes.
CPCB → Read More
Maharashtra carries India's highest NCAP non-attainment city count. The evidence of health harm is concentrated where the pollution burden is highest across India's most industrialised and urbanised state. The opportunity to lead is Maharashtra's.
Maharashtra → Read More
Uttar Pradesh has 17 NCAP non-attainment cities - more than any other state in the Indo-Gangetic Plain, and home to some of India's most acutely polluted cities by annual PM₂.₅ concentration. The evidence of health harm is strongest where the pollution burden is highest. The opportunity to lead is UP's.
Uttar Pradesh → Read More
MoHFW India has generated the evidence. Two decades of Indian research documents what PM₂.₅ does to Indian bodies. What is missing is the institutional architecture to translate that evidence into the policy response it demands.
General Stakeholders → Read More
How India's own research and data systems can strengthen the next phase of NCAP's health impact.
MOEFCC → Read More
MoHFW has established the framework. What is needed is the data linkage to make it consequential.
MoHFW Framework → Read More
MoWCD reaches India's most pollution-exposed children. What is needed is the formal connection between that exposure and their developmental outcomes.
MoWCD → Read More
NCDC has the mandate and the infrastructure. India's first Health Adaptation Plan for air pollution diseases is NCDC's own work. What is necessary is its activation.
NCDC → Read More
NITI Aayog has the advisory position at the policy apex. What is needed is an initiative to connect air quality to health outcomes.
NITI Aayog → Read More
SPCBs have the monitoring infrastructure. What is needed is the formal connection to health outcome data.
SPCBs → Read More
ICMR has the research mandate. What is needed is the commission to direct it at air pollution.
ICMR → Read More